11 December 2023

♧彡 Documentary Critical Reflection (v)

05

Critical Reflection: "Part-Time, Full-Time Student"

  “Part-Time, Full-Time Student” is a documentary I made with a group that captures the hardships of being a full-time high school student whilst having a part-time job. This essentially speaks out for those who lack time to do much for themselves as they struggle between the imbalance of both school and work. 

    The documentary aims for a target audience that wishes it could relate to, educate, and even rival ideas that may circle in the mouths of many. This includes other students who may struggle with being a full-time student while having to balance (several) extracurriculars or outside activities unrelated to school yet equally as crucial to them, people– including students, teachers, and parents– who may not have had the same struggles, who may not have understood how the lack of time due to school and work affect a student’s lifestyle before. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 55% of young people aged 16 through 24 are employed. Though these statistics include ages that surpass the years of high school, those particular people likely go to college. Both high school and college students have to balance between school life and work life, which may broaden the interest of the target audience that we look to relate to beyond high school students. 

    

    Because of our constantly changing society, many different expectations of students are changing alongside this moving society. Requirements for certain programs that several high school students rely on to pay for their future education– which in recent years, has been increasing quite dramatically– like the Bright Futures program, which recently also released higher minimum test scores for eligibility (from an SAT score of 1290 in 2017 to 1340 as of now), which has put a major toll on many students, especially those with minimal time to study. Part-time jobs that students acquire may be for many different purposes, such as helping pay for bills in their household or saving money for their future education– which of course, could not be enough to pay for the average tuition of $10,662 per year in a public college according to Emma Kerr and Sarah Wood’s article, “See the Average College Tuition in 2023-2024”. Students may have part-time jobs to earn money merely for their own spending as well, which is no less work than those saving money.


    Throughout the documentary, there were two particular documentaries that I used as a reference while editing. The first one: John Butler: A Short Documentary. This documentary was used as a reference to structure the interview audio. I would have refilmed our interview clips and audios if we had the chance to. I wished to capture an almost solemn tone as our subject is not particularly upbeat and happy. I tried to incorporate a sort of a pause in between and within questions– which I believe is more prominent in the first subject’s, Mia’s, section of the documentary, for example, timestamps 0:40-0:55 of the documentary.

Documentary Link


    I incorporated a bit of b-roll footage with its original, raw audio as a pause to make sure not too much information is delivered at once. I would refilm the interviews itself yet again though, as I wish to capture more variety of shots of the subject as they speak. Another documentary that was referenced was this: He Spent 40 Years Alone in the Woods, and Now Scientists Love Him | Short Film Showcase. I used this documentary to reference how to structure the b-roll. I only hoped that we would have compiled more b-roll to be able to portray our theme in a more eye-catching and interesting way. I would ensure in a future project that there would be an abundance of b-roll rather than just enough b-roll, which is especially evident throughout the entirety of the second subject’s, Sarah’s, portion. I also noticed that in both documentaries that I referenced, it included the shaky, handheld footage which allowed for a more organic look– which was not included in our documentary. This organic look tends to exist in many documentaries to allow the audience to feel more incorporated, though in our case, we did not include it.  

    

    Our documentary centers around two subjects who are high-school students with part-time jobs who struggle in this way, though it should have captured more of the ‘why’ aspect of the purpose of their part-time job to allow for the understanding of the changing expectations for students leading to part-time jobs which are just barely manageable alongside having to be a full-time student. Through these two subjects, we aimed to capture the essence of the struggles. With my part in the editing process, I made sure to allow the tone to work alongside the subjects words and feelings, using the proper low-beat music to creat a deeper, heavier feeling for the audience to exemplify the feeling of struggle. Supposedly, however, it is not preferred that it starts off that way. The best way that this could have been approached was to let the subjects lead on the tone, so the bias does not seem so forced upon the subject and audience.


    Throughout this project, I have learned quite a lot from having to make my own documentary. The real "doing" of compiling the project is much more intricate than just observing them. I hope that I can incorporate this newly learned knowledge in future documentaries. I want to be able to engage my audience more with my product(s), which even after this, will still require much more research.

10 December 2023

✄彡Documentary Production (iv)

04

Post-Production

    Editing the documentary was not very difficult (lie, it was a bit tricky considering how I had to consider the timing of the B-roll footage with the audio) at first until I realized when I played back what I edited, there was a major lack of B-roll footage. When I first reviewed the footage, I originally thought it was just enough, but 'just enough' is not enough. 
    
    There should always be extra footage that can be used. I had to restructure some of the audio and B-roll, but it still had almost too much space between the B-roll and interview footage. This is especially evident in Sarah's portion of the documentary.


    The red box in this image represents the B-roll footage as the one under is interview footage. By the 5-minute mark, Sarah's portion starts. Compared to Mia's portion, it severely lacked footage, even though Mia's portion was already lacking quite a bit.

    Another issue was during rendering, the all footage would randomly have the exposure set too high. This is as follows:
Footage during editing preview

Footage during rendering and export

    I never figured out how to fix this, but in the final version, Mia (group member) lowered the exposure-- perhaps a bit too much. It ended up being a bit inconsistent with some other footage that was added. I should have used Adobe After Effects instead of Adobe Premiere if I knew this technical issue would arise... Especially since I know my way through After Effects more than Premiere Pro, which I have not used since grade 8.

☾彡 Documentary Production (iii)

03

Production

    My role during the production of the documentary was not prominent for sure, as I took on the role of the editor. I did briefly ask my teammates to let me know if they needed me to help them film, but they seemed as if they had a plan for the filming themselves, so I pried no further (it was the very end of class after we finished planning, anyway). 

    Much of my time during production was really just watching a bit more documentaries and reviewing the basics of the editing program, Adobe Premiere Pro, that I chose. I still wonder why I chose this over my usual editor of Adobe After Effects. Perhaps I just wanted to revisit the program after I ditched it for After Effects a few years ago when I was just learning Premiere Pro in my 7th-grade film class.

    After Effects seems to have been a better choice but I went with Premiere Pro anyway. For the sake of good old times, maybe?

     I also did review some of the footage. The original three subjects turned to only two subjects due to the lack of usable content of the third subject, though.

☼彡 Documentary Research, Planning (ii)

02

Research

    The research that I did for this project focused on the editing of the film since it was my role as the editor to understand the conventions of what we are working with (documentary). Since two of the major components are the interview(s) and the B-roll footage, I wanted to find at least two references for these particular components. 
    
    After watching a few documentaries on YouTube, I chose two documentaries that I thought could work the best as references for this particular project, considering the tone we have for our project. I considered tone, especially for the interview reference, but for the B-roll, I chose the one that I found compiled the most interesting B-roll while not being too over the top or flashy.

 

    "John Butler" is the first documentary I referenced as I mainly studied this for its structure of the interview shots and audio. I noticed that there are quite a few pauses in and between the questions, giving the audience a bit of time to both process the information given and observe the surroundings of the subject. I particularly like the tone that was presented by this documentary.


    The second documentary is "He Spent 40 Years Alone in the Woods, and Now Scientists Love Him". I used this documentary as a reference to how I would structure the B-roll footage since I really liked how the B-roll footage was ordered.

Planning

    I think that planning our time for this project was quite tricky. With both of my two other group members having little time to record, the time to gather the footage was a bit constrained. Especially as one of the group members is one of the subjects of the documentary, being a student with a part-time job. It's almost a bit funny to me since the entire idea of the documentary is centered around full-time students with part-time jobs who do not have flexible schedules to do anything aside from work and be at school. 
    
    Even in this case, it seemed to be difficult to find the time to film her day, especially with the constraints of her job. Nevertheless, our planning sheet still included shots we wanted to shoot, much of which I don't think we can incorporate, like the tracking shots. Maybe we can film the shots at home (getting ready) can be filmed by another person so at least we can put in some other shots so it's more dynamic.

    I think the structure we planned is not too bad, I am just unsure whether or not we can carry out what we have planned.

    We also have three subjects planned as of now: Mia, Sarah, and Evan (or his cousin?).
    

06 December 2023

♬彡 Documentary Research (i)

01

Research (i)

    Recently, I was assigned to create a short documentary to learn its conventions and process. The very first step to this project was research, of course. What kind of new material or project would I start without any research? It started off in-class as a few documentary viewings, the most prominent ones being American Promise and Exit Through the Gift Shop

    The viewing for American Promise allowed me to pay closer attention to the structure of documentaries, especially because of the length of the film. The way that the B-roll footage and interviews were incorporated, how the timeline was set up over some time, and the transition and usage between the types of interviews to create a smooth documentary to accommodate for the lengthiness of the film. I enjoyed that even with only two main subjects, it still drew the audience in with the kind of information that was presented and how it was presented. The inclusion of organic scenes following the subjects following their everyday routine allows them to feel familiar with the audience.

    There was a certain style of editing that Exit Through the Gift Shop was able to execute that I liked. Perhaps it was just that it was stylized to pair with the punky music to match the theme of street art. The difference in editing and filming styles also flowed extremely well with the changes in the main subject. You can so clearly see the style shift mid-way through.

    Viewing Op-Docs was an assignment given after the viewing of those documentaries that we watched as a class. I chose "Now I'm in the Kitchen" and "Backflip" to view. 

    "Now I'm in the Kitchen" was about the narrator reminiscing about spending time with her mother; her memories, and her regrets. She reflects on what it means to be independent as her mother once mentioned as she makes a dish that her mother made when she still lived with her. I really resonate with the artsy, creative visuals and the very 'interesting' audio that was paired with it. Those two elements really drew me in as the narrator's voice-over was soft and alluring in a way that let me watch the entire video. 

    "Backflip" was about a man who attempted a backflip unsuccessfully, so he proceeded to make a digitalized version of himself to learn to backflip instead. I think that the concept and strange visuals of the digitalization process were really what drew me in for this Op-Doc. I liked that above all other elements of the documentary. But the structure and the provided information were crucial as well, of course.

    Overall, I want to say that I understand the flow and structure of the information that is given out to the audience some more. I think I want to be able to understand and focus on more and other conventions of documentaries, such as where incidental music would change to ensure the tone flows with the story.

★彡 Initiating my return to blogging

It's been a while, no?

Well, whether you like it or not, I am back. Yet again will I post about my silly projects, and whether you will or will not enjoy your journey watching my journey, I will persevere through anguish and pain to keep you entertained.

Forth shall we commence!